Curva de postura de gallinas Campero Casilda de primer ciclo

Authors

  • Bernanrdo Martín Romera Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Becario del Programa Estratégico de Formación de Recursos Humanos en Investigación y Desarrollo (PERHID).
  • Araceli Martines Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • Sabina Andrea Advínculo Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • Ramiro Fernández Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • José Ernesto Librera Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. EEA “Ing. Agr. Walter Kugler” INTA Pergamino
  • Zulma Edith Canet Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. EEA “Ing. Agr. Walter Kugler” INTA Pergamino
  • Ana María Dottavio Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • Ricardo José Di Masso Cátedra de Genética. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Abstract

Campero Casilda is a three-way cross evaluated for meat production and proposed as a dual-purpose bird for productive systems alternative to industrial poultry farming. The aim of this work was to describe its laying dynamics in comparison with that of two genotypes of layers for semi-intensive systems (Negra INTA and Rhode Island Red) and with that of the broiler breeder populations Ross 308® and Cobb 500®. Campero Casilda became earlier into lay and showed an overall performance 15% and 12% lower than Negra INTA and Rhode. This difference was explained by their condition of semi-heavy birds that
express to a lesser degree the growth-reproduction incompatibility reported in poultry production. The difference in the overall performance of the free-range birds was explained by a lower speed of approach to the peak of laying and a greater slope of decrease in the laying rate during persistence. Campero Casilda was less precocious, presented a lower laying rate at the peak and a decrease in overall performance between 3 and 7% compared to commercial heavy breeders. The lower performance was explained by its slower approach speed to a lower posture peak. In the persistence stage, on the other hand, even starting
from a lower initial value, it showed a lower slope of decline in the rate of oviposition. Campero Casilda presents an egg production curve compatible with the proposal of using as layers the females from this cross originally conceived to
use both sexes for meat production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C.J., Bell, D.D. (1980). Predicting poultry egg production. Poultry Science. 59(4): 937-938. doi: 10.3382/ps.0590937

Aggrey, S.E. (2002). Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves. Poultry Science. 81(12): 1782-1788. doi: 10.1093 /ps/81.12.1782

Antonio, J., Orozco, S., Ramírez, J. (2011). Contribución a la avicultura campesina en la disponibilidad alimentaria en familias indígenas del sureste mexicano. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal 4(1): 69-78.

Arthur, J.A., Albers, G.A.A. (2003). Industrial perspective on problems and issues associated with poultry breeding. En W.M. Muir y S.E. Aggrey, eds. Poultry genetics, breeding, and biotechnology. Wallingford, Reino Unido, CABI Publishing. 1-12.

Aviagen. Ross 308 Objetivos de rendimiento (2017). Recuperado de: http://es.aviagen.com /assets/Tech_enter/BB_Foreign_Language_Docs/Spanish_TechDocs/Ross308AP-PS-PO-ES-2017.pdf.

Barbato, G.F. (1999). Genetic relationships between selection for growth and reproductive effectiveness. Poultry Science 78(3): 444–452. doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.3.444

Bonino, M.F. (1997). Pollo Campero. Protocolo para la certificación. INTA. EEA Pergamino.

Canet, Z.E., Romera, B.M., Librera, J.E., Dottavio, A.M., Di Masso, R.J. (2018/19). Caracterización productiva de cinco poblaciones sintéticas de gallinas reproductoras camperas. Veterinaria Cuyana 13: 5-17

Castro, L., Núñez, L., Ramírez, L., Rodríguez, I., Florentín, A., Álvarez, R., Martínez-López, O.R. (2015). Biodiversidad de ecotipos de gallinas locales del Chaco Central y humedales del Ñeembucú, Paraguay. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservación Animal 6: 506-516.

Cobb-Vantress. Complemento para el manejo de reproductoras. Emplume lento. Hembras. (2013). Recuperado de: https://cobbstorage.blob.core.windows.net/guides/ Cobb500_SF_Breeder_ Management Supplement_V1_ES.pdf.

Farzin, N., Vaez Torshiz, I.R., Kashan, N.E.J., Gerami, A. (2010). Estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlations between monthly and cumulative egg productions in a commercial broiler female line. Global Veterinaria. 5(3): 164-167.

Fialho, F.B., Ledur, M.C. (1997). Segmented polynomial model for estimation of egg production curves in laying hens. British Poultry Science. 38(1): 66-73. doi: 10.1080/ 00071669708417942

Fitzhugh, H.A. (1976). Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shape. J Anim Sci 42 (4): 1036-1051. doi: 10.2527/jas1976.4241036x

García Trujillo, R., Berrocal J. L., Moreno, L., Ferrón, G. (2008) . Factores que afectan a la producción de huevos ecológicos en Andalucía. En Actas del VIII Congreso de la SEAE, Bullas, Murcia. https://www.agroecologia.net/recursos/publicaciones/publicaciones-online/2009/eventos-seae/cds/congresos/actas-bullas/seae_bullas/verd/sesiones/17%20S3D.%20GANADERIA%20(II)/S4D6.pdf

Grossman, M., Grossman, T.N., Koops, W.J. (2000). A model for persistency of egg production. Poultry Science 79(12):1715–1724. doi: 10.1093/ps/79.12.1715

Kerr, C.L., Hammerstedt, R.H., Barbato, G.F. (2001). Effects of selection for exponential growth rate at different ages on reproduction in chickens. Avian and Poultry Biology reviews 12(3): 127-136. doi: 10.3184/147020601783698503

Narinc, D., Uckardes, F., Aslan, E. (2014). Egg production curve analyses in poultry science. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 70(4): 817-28. doi: /10.1017/S0043933914000877

Nelder, J.A. (1961). The fitting of a generalization of the logistic curve. Biometrics. 17(1): 89-110. doi: 10.2307/2527498

Nelder, J.A. (1962). An alternative form of a generalized logistic equation. Biometrics. 18 (4): 614-616. doi: 10.2307/2527907

Pampín Balado, M., Madrazo Fonseca, G., Edghill, E., Caro J., Cañete, R. (2011). Caracteres productivos de la gallina semirústica en condiciones intensivas de producción. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Avícola 35 (2): 25-31.

Revidatti, F.P., Sindik, M., Rigonatto, T., Fernández, R., Revidatti, M.A., Sanz, Paola. (2013). Desempeño reproductivo de dos poblaciones maternas de gallinas Campero INTA. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservación Animal 3: 65-70.

Savegnago, R.P., Cruz, V.A., Ramos, S.B., Caetano, S.L., Schmidt, G.S., Ledur, M.C., El Faro, L., Munari D.P. (2012). Egg production curve fitting using nonlinear models for selected and nonselected lines of White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science 91(11): 2977-87. doi: 10.3382/ ps.2012-02277

Thiruvenkadan, A.K., Panneerselvaman, S., Prabakaran, R. (2010). Layer breeding strategies: an overview. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 66 (3): 477–502. doi: 10.1017/S0043933910000553

Published

2020-12-29

How to Cite

Romera, B. M., Martines, A., Advínculo, S. A., Fernández, R. ., Librera, J. E., Canet, Z. E., Dottavio, A. M., & Di Masso, R. J. . (2020). Curva de postura de gallinas Campero Casilda de primer ciclo. Ab Intus, (6), 36–46. Retrieved from http://www.ayv.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/Ab_Intus/article/view/52

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)