Hygiene scoring method in dairy cows

Authors

  • Nicolás Gerónimo Sambuceti Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, UNRC, Argentina
  • José María Raviolo Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, UNRC, Argentina

Abstract

Intensification and scaling up of dairy systems oen
leads to increased environmental pressure on animal health and
welfare. To evaluate the performance and evolution of these
systems, simple, applicable indicators easy and cheap to obtain are
necessary. Animal hygiene, related to animal health and welfare, is
useful and practical as an assessment tool. Most of the evaluation
methods respond to the predominant systems of production
and conditions in their place of development, being necessary
a hygiene qualification method adaptable to environmental and
productive conditions of our region. A dairy cow hygiene scoring
system that asses three different anatomical sites (udder, feet, and
upper leg) is proposed. Using five levels that represent percentages
of the evaluated body surface covered by dirt; Scoring from 0 (less
than 5%) to 4 (more than 60%), the values 1, 2 and 3 represent
ranges from 5 to 20%; 20 to 40% and 40 to 60% of the skin surface
covered by dirt, respectively. e score can be given for each
anatomical site and/or a global score per animal can be obtained
by averaging the score given to each site.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José María Raviolo, Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, UNRC, Argentina

Intensification and scaling up of dairy systems oen
leads to increased environmental pressure on animal health and
welfare. To evaluate the performance and evolution of these
systems, simple, applicable indicators easy and cheap to obtain are
necessary. Animal hygiene, related to animal health and welfare, is
useful and practical as an assessment tool. Most of the evaluation
methods respond to the predominant systems of production
and conditions in their place of development, being necessary
a hygiene qualification method adaptable to environmental and
productive conditions of our region. A dairy cow hygiene scoring
system that asses three different anatomical sites (udder, feet, and
upper leg) is proposed. Using five levels that represent percentages
of the evaluated body surface covered by dirt; Scoring from 0 (less
than 5%) to 4 (more than 60%), the values 1, 2 and 3 represent
ranges from 5 to 20%; 20 to 40% and 40 to 60% of the skin surface
covered by dirt, respectively. e score can be given for each
anatomical site and/or a global score per animal can be obtained
by averaging the score given to each site.

References

Ariza J.M., Levallois P., Bareille N., Arnoult A., y Guatteo R. 2020. Evaluation of a foot

dirtiness scoring system for dairy cows. Journal Dairy Sci. 103 (5): 4738-4742.

Breen JE, Green MJ, Bradley AJ. 2009. Quarter and cow risk factors associated with

the occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows in the United Kingdom. Journal

Dairy Sci. 92(6): 2551-2561. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1369

Cook, N.B. y Reinemann, D.A. 2007. A tool box for assessing cow, udder and teat

hygiene. Proceedings of the 46th Natl. Mastitis Counc: 31- 43.

DeVries, T. J., Aarnoudse, M. G., Barkema, H. W., Leslie, K. E., & von Keyserlingk,

M. A. G. 2012. Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene,

and risk of elevated somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Sci. 95(10): 5730–5739.

doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5375

Ellis, K. A., G. T. Innocent, M. Mihm, P. Cripps, W. G. McLean, C. V. Howard, and

D. Grove-White. 2007. Dairy cow cleanliness and milk quality on organic and

conventional farms in the UK. Journal Dairy Res. 74:302–310.

Guatteo, R., A. Arnoult, J.-L. Menard, and N. Bareille. 2013. Elaboration of a scoring

grid to assess feet cleanliness in dairy cattle and identification of risk factors in the

winter period. Rencontres Recherches Ruminants. 20: 379–382.

Hughes J. 2001. A system for assessing cow cleanliness. Practice. 23: 517-524

Popescu S., Razvan STEFAN, Eva-Andrea; DIUGAN; Cristin BORDA; Marina

SPINU; Carmen Dana SANDRU. 2010. Relationship Between Barn Hygiene

and Lameness Prevalence in irtyFive Transylvanian Dairy Farms. Bulletin

UASVM, Veterinary Medicine. 67(1). E-ISSN 1843-5378

Rajabi Iman, Alireza Taghavi Razavizadeh, Mohammad Azizzadeh, Babak Khoramian.

e investigation on the relationship between dairy cow hygiene scores and

intramammary infections

Reneau, J., Seykora A., Heins B., Endres M., Farnsworth R. y Bey R. 2005. Association

between hygiene scores and somatic cell scores in dairy cattle. JAVMA, 227:

-1301.

Relun, A., A. Lehebel, M. Bruggink, N. Bareille, and R. Guatteo. (2013). Estimation of

the relative impact of treatment and herd management practices on prevention of

digital dermatitis in French dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 110: 558–562.

Rowe S., Tranter W., Laven R., (2021) Longitudinal study of herd udder hygiene and

its association with clinical mastitis in pasture-based dairy cows, Journal Dairy

Sci.104 (5): 6051-6060

Schreiner, D. y Ruegg P. 2003. Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and

subclinical mastitis. Journal Dairy Sci. 86: 3460-3465.

Tadich, N. 2011. Bienestar animal en bovinos lecheros. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias

Pecuarias. 24(3): 293-300. ISSN: 0120-0690.

Welfare Quality Consortium. 2009. Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol for Cattle.

Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, the Netherlands

Published

2023-08-01 — Updated on 2023-08-10

Versions

How to Cite

Sambuceti, N. G., & Raviolo, J. M. (2023). Hygiene scoring method in dairy cows. Ab Intus, (11). Retrieved from https://www.ayv.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/Ab_Intus/article/view/98 (Original work published August 1, 2023)

Issue

Section

Notas técnicas